On Wednesday we held a goal setting meeting for the Sherman Fairchild project (a laboratory building full gut renovation). Representatives from the Architect, MEP Engineer, Project Management, Operations and Maintenance, Occupants, Office for Sustainability (both the green building services and the occupant engagement groups), Engineering and Utilities, IT, and EH&S were present to decide what constituted a "successful" project. Establishing goals and measures of success up front is important to getting everybody on the same page and should help quicken the design process and minimize change orders as all stakeholders have had a chance to provide their feedback.
Project goals were collected in the areas of "Project Performance", "Environmental Performance", "Human Health and Comfort", "Operations and Maintenance", and "Training and Education". OFS staff lead the meeting using the Nominal Group Technique, which collects a list of ideas from all stakeholders, gives attendees time to ask clarifying questions, and then ranks the goals to identify the most important. We'll take the results and compile a ranked set of project goals and the Owner's Project Requirements (OPR). The design team will respond to these documents in each of their design submittals and the commissioning authority will use OPR during the commissioning process. The agenda for the four hour meeting is attached here.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dear Sirs,
ReplyDeleteI work for a company that is building a LEED construction in Brasil. Now we need to make our OPR. Could you show us yours so that we can have a real example to help us make ours?
Thanks,
Rozana Oliveira
I am a student and just getting into the OPR portion of a commissioning class. While there are lots of websites with people expounding what should be done, I’m not finding guidance on details and examples of what’s important and how it’s documented. Do you have any suggestions, examples?
ReplyDelete